Chapter V

The Calendar-Changing Celtiberians Wars

Rome’s conquest of Celtiberia occurred throughout the 2nd century BCE. After the peace treaty signed by Tiberius (179 BCE), the Celtiberians internal social and economic situation was worsened by the pressure and abuse of Roman administrators. The triggering event for the war was the behaviour of the town of Segeda (Sekaisa, in El Poyo de Mara, Zaragoza). This town was building a new, reinforced wall further out, bringing into its jurisdiction the surrounding dwellers whether they liked it or not. Under the treaty of Tiberius, however, it was forbidden to found new cities or enlarge existing ones, sparking off a confrontation with Rome. The Senate sent Quintus Fulvius Nobilior (154 BCE) with a 30,000-strong consular army to subdue Segeda.

Phases of the conquest of the Meseta
Phases of the conquest of the Meseta.

Segeda’s wall had not yet been sufficiently strengthened so the inhabitants asked to be taken into Numantia, which welcomed them as allies and friends. In the opinion of Florus, Numantia was dragged into the war unjustly. These wars changed the Roman calendar. Up to that time the year had officially began on the Ides of March (15th), on which day the war-waging consuls and administrators were appointed. By the time they got to the meseta, however, it was late June. This meant a precious time was wasted, since war was waged in spring and summer.  Rome therefore saw itself forced to bring forward its calendar to the kalendas of January (day 1). We have hence inherited the Roman calendar as dictated by the Celtiberian wars.

 

The Siege of Scipio

The Roman Senate, and above all the hawks within it, could no longer put up with a small town like Numantia posing so many niggling problems to an army that was sweeping all before it elsewhere in the Mediterranean, especially at a time when its expansion was stretching resources to the limit. Numantia needed to be given short shrift; a general of maximum prestige would have to be sent to deal with it once and for all. Under public pressure the Senate appointed Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus, the leading hawk who had acquired the highest possible prestige with his destruction of the city of Carthage. As with Marcellus, the rules were bent to make him a Consul in January 134 BCE even though the official eligibility ten-year period had not yet passed since his previous appointment.

Scipio found he had to deal with a sadly depleted army of only about 20,000 men. From Rome he could bring only 4000 volunteers plus a few men seconded by Micipsa, King of Numidia. Drawing on the economic aid of Antiochus of Syria and Attalois of Pergamon, however, he was able to recruit many mercenaries, in the end mustering a contingent of two consular armies (60,000 men). Discipline was very slack so his first task was to lick them into shape by dint of harsh training sessions meant to imbue them with efficacy, discipline and morale. According to Appian , after the campaign against the Vaccaei, in 134 BCE, Scipio moved on to winter in the region of Numantia.

After having set up his two camps nearby the city, he placed one of them (Peña Redonda) under the orders of his brother, Maximus, and took the other (Castillejo) under his own control. As the Numantines were egging on the Romans to wage battle, he preferred to shut them in and wear them down by attrition. To do so he built seven forts around the city and ordered it to be surrounded by a moat and fence.

Roman camps around Numantia
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1
Castillejo Camp
Located 1 kilometer north of Numantia and, according to Schulten, was the headquarters of Scipio. In their excavations they found structures from three overlapping camps (those of consuls Marcelus, Pompeius, and Scipio). The most recent, with a surface area of 8 hectares, has a wall 5.5 m in width (two walls and filled with pebbles). In the interior, the praetorium, barracks, batteries, etc are preserved. There were found amphorae, Campanian ceramics, coins, weapons… Towards the southeast, the wall descends to the plain but it loses (perhaps for having the lagoon here that Apian mentioned) and reappears before arriving at Travesadas.
2
Fort of Travesadas
Schulten did not find the rest of the wall but part of the quarters and the Pretorian door flanked by two towers. Although they did not found the rest of the wall between this fort and that of Valdevorrón, the outline could be followed because remains of materials appear in this zone.
3
Fort of Valdevorrón
Traces of the wall were found. They were identified as interior walls, the Pretorian door and abundant small objetcs.
4
Peña Redonda
It is a hill surrounded by ravines. The camp that Scipio entrusted to his brother Fabius Maximus. Abundant remains of buildings and materials were found in this place. Surrounded by a 4 meter width wall, it conserves the pretorian and decumana entrances, and in its interior pretorium, forum, batteries and barracks for the legions.
5
Fort of Molino
Situated on a flat terrace of 2 hectares near the joining of the rivers Duero and Merdancho. Schulten found remains of four half preserved barracks and four complete barracks of the infantry, and stables and bedrooms of a cavalry squad, but not the wall.
6
Fort of Dehesilla
It is the biggest fort in the proximity. A wall 4 m wide and a surface of 14.6 hectares.
7
Fort of Peña del Judio
It is a small bastion where a 2.5 m wide and 0.9 m high wall and a 2 x 2 m square tower were found
8
Fort of Alto Real
Excellent strategic position, northeast of Numantia and surrounded by the curve that Duero traces north of the hill. Schulten located on this hill a fort surrounding the wall 2 m wide. Remains of amphorae, Campanian ceramics, Celtiberian ceramics were found…some authors doubt that may be part of the ruins of the the fort wall.
9
Fort of Vega
Located on a small terrace of two hectares next to the joining of the rivers Duero and Tera. Schulten found remains of the wall, and varied artifacts.
10
Riverside Castles
Two dams mark the remains of the two forts that Apain speaks of, one on each shore of the river. Scipio spread rafts from them, carrying darts and spears to make access impossible from the surface of the river or diving.

When this work was finished, to make the bulwark even stronger, he built yet another moat a little bit further out, bristling with stakes. For good measure he then built a wall eight feet wide and ten feet high, without counting the battlements. Several arrow-launching towers were built, each one about thirty metres from the other. It proved impossible to prolong the wall over the nearby lake, so he built a causeway across it of the same height and width.

Siege of Numantia
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1
Siege wall and towers
This would have been the besiegers’ view. A 3m-high wall (plus 1.5 m of apparatus) with wooden towers every 30 metres along the whole 9 km perimeter.
2
A deep ditch armed with pointed stakes... but, who on earth would dare to escape from these siegeworks? Perhaps it was more permeable than might first be thought; in any mercenary army there was always some purchase for corruption.
3
The towers were wooden, multi-tiered. The upper tier was used for inter-camp communication by means of visual signals. This information was received instantly, making sure needy areas were given immediate reinforcements.
4
Stones launched by catapults and slings, fire arrows to start fires... The projectiles crashed into the walls or against the houses. The Numantines had to wear protective helmets when they went abroad within the besieged town; any stone launched from a sling 300 metres away could easily turn out to be fatal. Sling-launched stones were the besiegers’ most commonly used weapon against the soldiers working around the city.
5
The wall was four metres high plus an additional superstructure of 2 metres. Depending on the particular vulnerability of each zone, the wall was built higher or lower. In the sheer zone dropping down to the River Duero, for example, the wall did not need to be so high, while it did need to be built up higher in the more accessible eastern and northern zones.
6
A patrol passageway separated the wall from the houses. Impacts from the Roman missiles called for continual repair work.
7
The catapult is a war machine used to launch stones, javelins and fireballs up to a distance of about 400 m. The Roman engi-neers built them in situ; they did not need to be brought in from elsewhere.
8
The front-line houses, hard by the wall and within easier firing range, were the hardest hit.
9
The drawing simplifies the distances. The siegewall was 300 to 1000 metres from the city. According to Appian there were also closer towers and stockades. The attacks from Roman war machines were launched from closer zones to bring more within range.

Instead of bridges over the River Douro he towered the river downstream from the union between the Merdancho and Douro, stringing from tower to tower across the river a cable hung with blades and darts (stimuli) to prevent both boats and swimmers from leaving or entering the besieged city. Nothing daunted, the irrepressible Numantines tried to break the siege on several occasions. Finally their greatest warrior Rhetogenes, accompanied by five fellow counter-attackers and five servants, managed with incredible derring-do to break the blockade on a dark night of spring 133 BCE, surprising and killing the sentries, thereafter escaping quickly on horseback.

Closing the Douro using rafts with spikes
Vase of the warriors
Vase of the warriors.

He first went for help to the Arevaci cities, urging them to rebel anew against Rome, but his plea was rejected due to fear of Roman reprisals. Only in the city of Loutia (lying 56 km from Numantia, but in an unidentified location) did Rhetogenes muster any support from the young warriors. But the city’s Assembly of Elders got wind of the intended rebellion and tipped off Scipio, trying to head off the dreaded reprisals. But the Roman general sped to Loutia and occupied the city. He then ordered the elders to hand over all the young warriors, about 400 in all, cruelly cutting off their right hands as punishment.

Scipio was well aware that cutting off the right hand of a Celtiberian meant subjecting him to an undignified death; he could no longer wield a sword and was therefore unable to die in battle to reach the Great Beyond in company with the gods. After the Rhetogenes fiasco in Loutia the Numantines sued for peace. A five-man commission headed by the Numantine leader Avarus pleaded with Scipio “to pardon this brave, lion-hearted people, offering them lenient terms”. Scipio rejoined “that they hand over first their arms and then themselves with their city”. The Numantines were furious upon hearing this answer, killing Avarus and his companions on suspicion that they had struck a deal with Scipio to save their own skins. The worst thing was not the hunger but not being able to die fighting.



Gallery of chapter images

go on to chapter VI >>>Who Reoccupied the Cerro de La Muela After Scipio’s Destruction of Numantia?


Bibliographical references
  • Alvar Ezquerra, Antonio (2017). “El camino hacia la gloria: el sueño de Escipión”. En: Baquedano, Enrique y Marian Arlegui Sánchez (coord.). Schulten y el descubrimiento de Numantia. Catálogo de la exposición del Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, de abril a julio de 2017 y del Museo Numantino en Soria, de julio de 2017 a enero de 2018, pp. 240-251. ISBN: 978-84-451-3607-2.
  • Apiano. Iber. Las guerras ibéricas de Appiano Alejandrino. Traducidas del texto greco-latino de Juan Schweighauser al castellano, con notas históricas y geográficas, por Miguel Cortés y López. Valencia, 1852.  
  • Bermejo Tirado, Jesús (2017). “La cerámica romana en los campamentos republicanos de Renieblas”. En: Baquedano, Enrique y Marian Arlegui Sánchez (coord.). Schulten y el descubrimiento de Numantia. Catálogo de la exposición del Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, de abril a julio de 2017 y del Museo Numantino en Soria, de julio de 2017 a enero de 2018, pp. 284-301. ISBN: 978-84-451-3607-2.
  • Dobson, Michael (1996). The Roman camps at Numantia: a reappraisal in the light of a critical analysis of Polybius' discourse on the Roman army.  
  • Dobson, Michael (2016). The Army of the Roman Republic: The Second Century BC, Polybius and the Camps at Numantia, Spain. Oxford. ISBN 9781842172414.  
  • Dobson, Michael y Fernando Morales Hernández (2008). “Monedas inéditas de los campamentos romanos republicanos del cerco de Escipión y de la Gran Atalaya de Renieblas, y algunas consideraciones cronológicas sobre el campamento V de Renieblas”. Archivo Español de Arqueología, 81, pp. 213-228. ISSN: 0066 6742.  
  • Dobson, Michael y Fernando Morales Hernández (2010). “Coinage from the Roman Republican Camps at Numantia and Renieblas (Prov. Soria), with a Discussion of Some Recently Found Unpublished Coins and the Dating of Lager V at Renieblas”. Madrider Mitteilungen, 51, pp. 323-347. ISBN: 978-3-89500-753-8.
  • Dobson, Michael y Neil Faulkner (2011). “New Model Legion. The archaeology of Roman Camps at Numantia”. Current World Archaeology, 48, pp. 24–31.
  • Fernández Uriel, Pilar y Javier Cabrero Piquero (2017). “Publio Cornelio Escipión Emiliano”. En: Baquedano, Enrique y Marian Arlegui Sánchez (coord.). Schulten y el descubrimiento de Numantia. Catálogo de la exposición del Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, de abril a julio de 2017 y del Museo Numantino en Soria, de julio de 2017 a enero de 2018, pp. 226-239. ISBN: 978-84-451-3607-2.
  • Gómez Pantoja, Joaquín L. y Fernando Morales Hernández (2008). “Los etolios en Numancia”. Salduie, 8, pp. 37-58. ISSN: 1576-6454.
  • Hildebrandt, Hans Joachim (1979). “Die Römerlager von Numantia. Datierung anhand der Münzfunde”. Madrider Mitteilungen, 20, pp. 238-271. ISSN: 0418-9744.
  • Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo (2002). “Numancia: campamentos romanos y cerco de Escipión.” Archivo Español de Arqueología, LXXV, 185-186, pp. 159–176. ISSN: 0066-6742.  
  • Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo (2005). “Numancia y los campamentos romanos: investigación y recuperación del pasado”. En: Cesáreo Pérez González y Emilio Illarregui Gómez (coords.): Arqueología militar romana en Europa, Salamanca, pp. 237-250. ISBN 84-9718-294-4.
  • Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo (2006). “Conquest and romanization in Celtiberia Ulterior: Numantia as a paradigm”. En Lorenzo Abad Casal, S. Keay y Sebastián F. Ramallo Asensio (eds.): Early Roman towns in Hispania Tarraconensis. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 62, pp. 172-183. ISBN: 1-887829-62-8.
  • Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo y Ana María Martín Bravo (1995). “Estratigrafía y numismática: Numancia y los Campamentos”. En María Paz García-Bellido y Rui Manuel Sobral (eds.): La Moneda Hispánica. Ciudad y Territorio. Anejos del Archivo Español de Arqueología, XIV, pp. 180-190. ISBN: 84-00-07538-2.
  • Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo y Antonio Chaín Galán (2017). “La Guerra Numantina: cerco y conquista de Numancia”. En Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo (coord.): Numancia Eterna (2150 Aniversario: la memoria de un símbolo). Valladolid, pp. 235-250. ISBN: 9788497186827.
  • Jimeno Martínez, Alfredo, Antonio Chaín Galán, Raquel Liceras y Sergio Quintero Cabello (2015). “La Numancia que resistió a Escipión Emiliano”. En Manuel Bendala Galán (coord.): Los Escipiones: Roma conquista Hispania. Exposición celebrada en el Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, pp. 259-273. ISBN: 978-84-451-3527-3.
  • Luik, Martin (2002). Die Funde aus den römischen Lagern um Numantia im Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseum. Maguncia. ISBN: 9783884670719.
  • Luik, Martin (2009). “Die römischen Militärlager bei Renieblas, Prov. Soria. Stand der Erforschung und zukünftige Perspektiven”. En: Morillo, A.; Hanel, N. y Martín, E. (Eds): Actas del XX Congreso Internacional de la Frontera Romana (León 2006). Anejos de Gladius, 13, pp. 541–550. ISBN: 9788400088545.
  • Luik, Martin (2017). “Los hallazgos menores de los campamentos romanos”. En: Baquedano, Enrique y Marian Arlegui Sánchez (coord.). Schulten y el descubrimiento de Numantia. Catálogo de la exposición del Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, de abril a julio de 2017 y del Museo Numantino en Soria, de julio de 2017 a enero de 2018, pp. 270-283. ISBN: 978-84-451-3607-2.
  • Morales Hernández, Fernando (2004). “Los campamentos y fuertes romanos del asedio de Numancia”. En: Pérez-González, C.; Illarregui, E. (Coords.): Actas de Arqueología Militar Romana en Europa (Segovia, 2001). Salamanca, pp. 251-258. ISBN: 84-9718-294-4.
  • Morales Hernández, Fernando (2006). “Circunvallatio of Numantia. Forts and siege works”. En: Morillo, A.; Aurrecoechea, J. (Eds): The Roman Army in Hispania. An Archaeological Guide. León, pp. 249-262. ISBN: 8497732847.
  • Morales Hernández, Fernando (2009). “El cerco de Numancia: El cierre del Duero”. Gladius, XXIX, pp. 71-92. ISSN: 0436-029X.  
  • Morales Hernández, Fernando (2009). “El trazado de la circunvalación de Numancia. Pasado y presente de la investigación”. En: Morillo, A.; Hanel, N. y Martín, E. (Eds): Actas del XX Congreso Internacional de la Frontera Romana (León 2006). Anejos de Gladius, 13, pp. 289-300. ISBN: 9788400088545.
  • Morales Hernández, Fernando y Michael Dobson (2005). “Why ‘La Rasa’ was not a camp of the Scipionic siege of Numantia”. Madrider Mitteilungen, 46, pp. 104-111. ISSN: 0418-9744.
  • Quesada Sanz, Fernando (2017). “La Segunda Guerra Celtibérica”, Desperta Ferro: Antigua y medieval, 41 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Numancia), pp. 22-29. ISSN: 2171-9276.
  • Quesada Sanz, Fernando (2017). “Los antagonistas en las guerras numantinas: mitos, concepción y práctica de la guerra y efectivos”. En: Baquedano, Enrique y Marian Arlegui Sánchez (coord.). Schulten y el descubrimiento de Numantia. Catálogo de la exposición del Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, de abril a julio de 2017 y del Museo Numantino en Soria, de julio de 2017 a enero de 2018, pp. 202-225. ISBN: 978-84-451-3607-2.
  • Sanfeliu Lozano, Daniel, Carmen Herreros González y María Carmen Santapau Pastor (2003). “Vajilla y alimentación en la guerra de "Numantia": su reflejo en las fuentes literarias”. Iberia: Revista de la Antigüedad, VI, pp. 7-24. ISSN 1575-022.  
  • Sopeña Genzor, Gabriel (2017). “Emiliano en el Ebro: el camino hacia Numancia”. En: Baquedano, Enrique y Marian Arlegui Sánchez (coord.). Schulten y el descubrimiento de Numantia. Catálogo de la exposición del Museo Arqueológico Regional de Alcalá de Henares, de abril a julio de 2017 y del Museo Numantino en Soria, de julio de 2017 a enero de 2018, pp. 164-173. ISBN: 978-84-451-3607-2.